Road Hill House, front view |
I find the Road Hill House case to be very fascinating. Not only because
both the case and Mr Whicher himself have inspired numbers of authors
afterwards, or that they have, in a way, “laid the foundation” of how we
picture the typical detective and detective story today. It is also fascinating
and interesting because of the public hysteria it caused in the 1860s and years
to come after it. Even now, there are still
people who speculate about the true purpose of the murder and who truly was
involved in it.
The Road Hill House mystery is special in so many different ways, and one
of the main reasons for this is because of Mr Jonathan ‘Jack’ Whicher. Mr
Whicher was described as “the prince of detectives” by one of his colleagues
and he was one of the founding members of the first detective force in the
English-speaking world (The Guardian). He was assigned to the case when local
policemen were unsuccessful to find the killer, and only days after he arrived
at Road Hill House he had developed a brilliant solution to the mystery. He
shocked society by accusing the 16-year-old Constance Kent, daughter of Samuel
Kent and half-sister to the victim, for the murder of her younger brother. Mr
Whicher based these accusations on a missing nightdress. In my opinion, you
have to be quite clever to come to this conclusion based on so vague evidence,
and still be utterly convinced by it [this will be discussed further on]. One
of the reasons why this caused public hysteria was because a working class
detective accused a young lady of superior breeding. Mr Whicher did not only
cause a public arouse, but he was also attacked by the press and the House of
Commons for his ‘horrifying allegations’ (The Guardian).
This difference in class was used as a sub-plot by Wilkie Collins in his
detective novel ‘The Moonstone’ (1868). Collins’s novel is similar to the case
in other ways as well. He fashioned from it a template for detective fiction,
but instead of a child-murder and bloodstains, he wrote about a jewel theft and
splashes of paint (The Guardian). Very much like the Road Hill House case,
there is an investigator in The Moonstone who strives to expose the secrets of
the inhabitants of an English country house, and his task is to distinguish the
innocent from the guilty. Collins also borrowed some details from the Road Hill
House ‘story’, such as a sullied and missing nightdress; a laundry book that
proves its loss; an incompetent local police officer; and a renowned detective
summoned to the countryside from London.
Another author who found inspiration in the Road Hill House case, and in
Mr Whicher, is Mary Elizabeth Braddon and her novel ‘Lady Audley’s Secret’
(1862). The novel features some details which were present at Road Hill, such
as a ‘wicked’ stepmother (a governess who married a gentleman), a brutal murder
at an elegant country house, a body pushed into a well, and the fact that the
novel’s characters are fascinated by detection and terrified of exposure. Mr
Whicher is also “present” as the amateur detective Robert Audley.
Both ‘Lady Audley’s Secret’ and ‘The Moonstone’ were among the most
famous of the “sensation” or “enigma” novels of the 1860s, and they were what
Henry James called “those most mysterious of mysteries, the mysteries that are
at our own doors… the terrors of the cheerful country house, or the busy London
lodgings”. Their secrets were exotic, but their settings were oh so familiar.
The living arrangement in the Kent’s family during Samuel Kent’s first
marriage is also very similar to the novel ‘Jane Eyre’. Samuel was living with
his (supposed to be) derange wife and with an increasingly favoured governess,
and this triangle has spectacular parallels with Charlotte Bronte’s novel
(which by the way was published long before the murder at Road Hill House even
happened).
Constance Kent (in 1874) |
So in the end, Mr Whicher’s suspicions about Miss Kent and the nightgown
were proven true. I think it’s so impressive to come to the conclusion that she
did it, based on a missing nightgown, the fact that she had been hiding clothes
in that privy before and that she was physically strong (which is not much to
go on). Based on the lack of evidence, one can understand why people thought
that these accusations were very vague, so it’s amazing that Mr Whicher was
right. He really is the true Sherlock Holmes, and it is sad that he did not get
the acknowledgement he should have gotten while he was alive; that he is more
famous now, after his death, for the inspiration he gave to the fictional
detective, rather than the actual forensic skills he had as a detective. However,
I am glad that people can still appreciate him now (even though they may not
know it) through fiction, instead of leaving him and his brilliant mind behind - unknown - in the past.
Bibliography
http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1035832/The-whodunnit-How-murder-year-old-boy-gave-fictional-detectives-know-today.html
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/apr/05/featuresreviews.guardianreview29
Summerscale, Kate (2008) The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, London: Bloomsbury
You have a photo of Constance's brother as the detective !
ReplyDeleteyes thats William
ReplyDeleteMy husband Left me after years of our marriage, He started the spiritual prayer on my husband, and gave me so much assurance and guaranteed me that he was going to bring my husband back to my feet in just 48 hours of the prayer. I was so confident in his work and just as he said in the beginning, my husband is finally back to me again, yes he is back with all his hearts, Love, care, emotions and flowers and things are better now. I would have no hesitation to recommend him to anybody who is in need of help..Robinson.buckler@yahoo.com…
ReplyDeleteThanks again,
Ottawa, Canada