To equip, or to embellish, what role does furniture really
fulfil? The Oxford English Dictionary
defines ‘furnishing’ as the “action of fitting out or equipping,” whilst too
defining such a process as an “action of decorating or embellishing.” The use
of the words “equipping” and “embellishing” to define the act of ‘furnishing’
reflects a shift apparent in furniture as of the Victorian period as the
eccentricity of the age meant houses were no longer merely “equipped,” but
homes were rather “embellished.” As commented by Clive D. Edwards in his book Victorian Furniture, Technology and Design,
as well as considering “comfort, cost, and suitability, consumers demanded
other attributes from an object that would convey particular images and
connotations to themselves and to others,” (4). I am going to explore such a shift
in furniture from a means of 'equipping' to an end of 'embellishment' in the
Victorian period.
Image sourced from the Victoria and Albert Museum, London
This elaborate Indian table epitomises the eccentricity of
the Victorians. Made in 1880, the high probability for its production being in
response to an escalating demand for Middle Eastern furnishings within Europe
reflects the shift from the ownership of furniture as a means of 'equipping'
your abode to an end of 'embellishment.'
The meticulously designed patterns and octagonal shape displays how furniture
was a manifestation of the people as the decorated pattern reflects the desire
of the Victorians to laden their lives with ostentatious items. The octagonal
shape of the table is striking as the unconventional design represents the shift
in the purpose of furniture from a means to an end; as such a decision reflects
a supply for an apparent demand based wholly on aesthetic desire. The Indian
origin of this table is pivotal as such trade of furniture that could quite
easily be created at home depicts the unconventional nature of the Victorians
as the escalating desire for such an item reveals how far removed from
tradition the Victorians really were.
This display of eccentricity can be seen in Elizabeth Gaskell’s
unorthodox novel Mary Barton through
the scrutiny of the Barton’s “table, which I should call a Pembroke, only that
it was made of deal, and I cannot tell how far such a name may be applied to
such humble material,” (15). It is clear that Gaskell’s use of the words
“should” (15) alongside the idea of a “name” (15) to be “applied” (15) is a
deliberate decision to depict the eccentricity of the Victorians as the need to
comment on what “name” (15) “should” (15) or shouldn’t be “applied” (15) to the
table is reflective of the Victorian desire to possess different and daring
furniture in an attempt to portray a higher class.
Image sourced from the Victoria and Albert Museum, London
This image exhibits an oriental appearing tea set that
expresses Victorian eccentricity at its most charmingly untraditional. The set
was produced from 1891 to 1894 and Victorian
eccentricity lies in its foreign appearance which indicates the unconventional
desires of the Victorians. Eccentricity is revealed in the fact that the
creator of this tea set was in fact British. Christopher Dresser designed the
tea service most likely with Japanese art in mind since he was the first
designer from Europe to travel to the country in 1876. The way this art was
made by a British man for a British Antiques store, Leuchars and Sons, evidences eccentricity as they were recreating foreign
art in their own. The intricate ‘willow’ effect design of the tea set with the
electric blue pattern set against a bright white background exhibits eccentricity
as the bold colours reflects the bold movement in furniture from a means to an
end. Victorian furniture as such a manifestation of irregularity can also be
seen in Mary Barton in the
description of the Barton’s home that outlines how “resting against the wall,
was a bright green japanned tea tray,” 15. The use of the word “japanned” (15)
here reflects this unconventional shift as the use of the past tense suggests a
process that has been undertaken to achieve such an effect as opposed to the
tea tray actually being of Japanese origin. This adoption of Japanese design is
further explored in the notes to the text that explain that so called
‘Japanning’ is a process by which a piece is “varnished to imitate Japanese
lacquer work,” (400). The word “imitate” (400) highlights the move from
furniture as a means to an end as it was such an expression of the eccentricity
of the people that it was even accessibleto and sought after by the
working class.
Image sourced from the Victoria and Albert Museum
This elegantly painted tray demonstrates the eccentricity of
the Victorians. Created in 1850, it expresses the extravagance of the
Victorians in a similar way to the tea set seen above as the scene depicted on
the piece “imitate(s)” (400) an oil painting, the original owner of which was
the Duke of Devonshire. Eccentricity is seen through the inconsistent nature of
the fact that focal to the tray is a painting that “imitates” (400) another,
but such is bordered by gilt and mother of pearl. This tray was manufactured by
Jennens and Bettridge whose work displays great Victorian eccentricity. In his
book Victorian Furniture, Technology and
Design, Clive D. Edwards comments that the reason for Jennens and
Bettridge’s “fame rests on their use of unusual materials to decorate the blank
shapes,” (128). This idea of filling “blank shapes” (128) demonstrates how this
era was so eccentric the excess was even made accessible to the working
classes. This can too be seen in Mary
Barton within the description of the “bright green Japanned tea-tray,
having a couple of scarlet lovers embracing in the middle [of it]. The
firelight danced merrily on this, and ready (setting all taste but that of a
child’s aside) it gave a richness of colouring to that side of the room,” (15).
Displaying the accessibility of eccentricity is the idea of “all taste but that
of a child’s [is] set aside,” (15) combined with the fact that the very same
tray provided “a richness of colouring,” (15). The “richness” (15) supplied by
the tray reveals the extravagance of even the working class in their wares, whilst
the idea of it only appealing to the “taste (…) of a child,” (15) demonstrates
how, as displayed in Jennens and Bettridge’s tray, this is nothing more than a
mere working class Imitation.
Through not only the trade but recreation of foreign art,
the use of rare, ornate materials and the accessibility to such excessiveness
within necessary domestic objects displays how Victorian furniture is a
manifestation of the eccentricity of the people of the age. As declared by Edwards
furniture and “furnishings are a classic case of the unspoken communication. They
reflect the times and conditions that have made them, but at the same time
express the aspirations and values of the owner,” (4). As Victorian furniture
starkly expresses eccentricity it “reflect[s] the time,” (4) and acts indeed as
an “unspoken communication” of the shift from furniture as a means to “equip”
to and end of “embellishment.”
Works cited
Edwards, Clive D., Victorian Furniture, Technology and Design. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993.
Gaskell, Elizabeth, Mary Barton. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited, 2012.
Oxford
English Dictionary Oxford : Oxford
University Press 2013. 3rd November 2013. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/75684?redirectedFrom=furniture#eid
I like your take on how furniture has the capacity to fulfil one's life especially in the Victorian period where it holds a major component in the domestic household and highlights one's social status. I enjoyed reading this entry as I found the detail in it was as specific as the detail one would find in the pieces of furniture.
ReplyDeleteI also looked at japanned items in the Victorian home, I enjoyed your take on this. As well as this, I enjoyed your ideas on whether the furniture 'embellished' or 'equipped' the Victorian home.
ReplyDeleteMy husband Left me after years of our marriage, He started the spiritual prayer on my husband, and gave me so much assurance and guaranteed me that he was going to bring my husband back to my feet in just 48 hours of the prayer. I was so confident in his work and just as he said in the beginning, my husband is finally back to me again, yes he is back with all his hearts, Love, care, emotions and flowers and things are better now. I would have no hesitation to recommend him to anybody who is in need of help..Robinson.buckler@yahoo.com…
ReplyDeleteThanks again,
Ottawa, Canada