Sanger's Coronation programme, 1953 |
It was in the Victorian period that
circuses rose to the commercial popularity we associate them with now. With
more exciting and skilful acts being added each show, crowds would flock with
a shared taste for spectacle, in hopes of being entertained. At first, the
young Queen Victoria’s open love of the circus calmed people’s reservations in
regards to how attendance would reflect on them individually and for a long
while the circus existed seemingly loved and revered by all. They would gather
with ready eyes and ready pockets to appreciate the likes of trick riders, animal
tamers, acrobats, jugglers, sword eaters and of course clowns. It was a
travelling hub of entertainment, enchanting audiences with a combination of the
magnificent and the bizarre. The sexual glamor, daring stunts, and athleticism
of the female performers were particularly fascinating for a Victorian
audience. And the rise of rail transport meant that circuses could perform near
enough all year round, travelling greater distances and reaching a wider
variety of places and people.
However, it was in the second half of Queen
Victoria’s reign that certain incidents occurred, prompting people to question
the respectability of such an event. In Charles Dickens novel Hard Times (1854), he writes of how
Thomas Gradgrind, a respectable man defined by his strict belief in rational thinking,
walks past the circus: “pass(ing) on as a practical man ought to pass on.”
Gradgrind likens the circus performers to “noisy insects” and thinks of
“consigning them to the House of Correction.” Although at this point in the
novel Dickens is adopting a mocking, ironic tone towards his character, playing
on the idea that the man’s ‘practical’ ways keep him from enjoying his life,
and in this instance the “hidden glories” of the circus, the negative opinion
of circus folk being assigned to Gradgrind was soon to become a reality for
many of the nonfictional company that Dickens kept, and even somewhat the
writer himself. Issues were beginning to be raised in the Victorian society
concerning both the danger and modesty of the circus acts, with a specific
focus on the female acrobats.
Photo of the letter from Her Royal Highness to the Mayor of Birmingham, |
Selina Powell being carried by her husband, mid 19th century |
Sketch 'Amusement for the People!' from Tomahawk. Mocking women who chose to take part in the circus in spite of the obvious dangers (July 1868) |
Once Powell’s accident had begun the discussion
on whether or not the circus was a respectable place, it was hard to silence
the critics. People began to speak out about the costumes of the female
acrobats, labeling them vulgar and promiscuous.
These women, with their athletic, muscular bodies draped in spangles and
sparkles, often appearing to be wearing nothing more than leotards, were the
living embodiment of individualism. Some embraced the idea behind the image,
that the women, and all performers for that matter, when performing, were to be
treated as spectacles. They were to be gazed on and appreciated as a talent,
separated from the crowd and in that moment, from societal conventions. In
Browning’s poem Fifine at the Fair (1872), he seems favour this idea as he likens
the female trapeze artist to a fairy:
“Next, who is this performs the feat of the
Trapeze?
Lo, she is launched, Look – fie, the fairy!
–
how she flees
O’er all those heads thrust back, - mouths,
Eyes, one gape and stare, -
No scrap of skirt impedes free passage
through
the air,
Till, plumb on the other side, she lights
and
laughs again,
That fairy-form, whereof each muscle, nay,
each vein
The curious may inspect”
However, many disagreed and the women’s scantly
clad uniforms moved the Lord Chamberlain to release a warning to all places of
public amusement stating “there is much reason to complain of the impropriety
of costume of the ladies… now… that the question has been taken up by the press
and public opinion… (I feel) compelled to call it to the serious attention of
the managers.”
The issue of female performers being made
to look indecent, came to a head when posters of the famous female acrobat Zaeo
were released prior to her performance with the Barnum and Bailey circus at The
Royal Aquarium (a building that once stood in Westminster, built to be a place
of amusement and entertainment). The poster was seen by some as improper due to
the amount of Zaeo’s skin visible in the image, and as the posters laced the
streets of London, people that did not support the circus or its apparent
exhibition of women were forced to take part in the spectacle in their
day-to-day lives.
Poster of Zaeo, from The Life of Zaeo, 1891 |
However, another argument that surfaced was
that the images of this proud, and visibly strong woman, acted as a symbol of
female vigour. It introduced the idea of women as not needing to be delicate and
girlish, instead muscular and athletic. One journalist, after seeing Zaeo’s
performance in 1898 labeled her the “new woman.” Early feminist responses to
the poster were plentiful; one woman when comparing Zaeo to the more ‘proper’
profession of a shop assistant who in her words was “cribbed, cabined and
confined during the day,” explained that the pictures of the acrobat
demonstrated “the grace, stateliness and strength which may all be acquired by
bodily exercise.” Zaeo herself defended her profession in an interview claiming
that being an athletic woman “is the very best thing in the world.”
Grand International Cirque Programme, 1884-1885 |
Both Powell and Zaeo had an enormous impact
on the world of the circus and its place in society. Though it could be argued
that Powell was as careless as Zaeo was enlightened, her death set in motion
the safety measures that allowed the circus to continue, with fewer injuries, eventually
becoming the much safer likes of what we would enjoy today. Zaeo on the other
hand, prompted people into a state of New Age thinking. Though it cannot be
said that her influence changed the world, and many never ceased to view her as
anything more than an inappropriate figure, to convince even just a few people
that women could be more than just delicate flowers, concealed behind layers of
petticoats, is undeniably a worthwhile feat. The female acrobats’ were
constantly pushing both physical and cultural boundaries. And in spite of the
harsh judgments that were cast by many, at a time of industrialised growth and
increased urbanisation, thousands of people continued to visit the circus for a
much-needed release, and, the uninhibited, free-moving performers, scantly clad
in sparkles and spangles, continued to earn the appreciation of the crowds
below.
Bibliography
Assael, Brenda. The Circus and Victorian Society. University of Virginia Press.
June 2005
Browning, Robert. ‘Fifine at the Fair’ from
The Complete Works of Robert Browning. Ohio
University Press: 2007
Dickens, Charles. ‘All Year Round’ from Uncommercial traveller (Google eBook),
Interactive. Accessed 20/11/14.
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. Wordsworth Editions. London: 1995.
David, Tracy. ‘The Moral Sense of the Majorities:
Indecency and Vigilance in Late-Victorian Music Halls’ from Popular Music. p39-52. Accessed
21/11/14.
Victoria and Albert Museum. Victorian Circus. Webpage. http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/v/victorian-circus/
Accessed: 20/11/14.
Zarrilli, Phillip. Theatre Histories: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis: 2010
I had no idea that the circus was so prevalent and popular during Victorian times! And the Powell incident is incredibly shocking! Thanks for sharing; this post has definitely been enlightening and has challenged my views of the Victorian period as such a strict, "no nonsense" time.
ReplyDeleteThe photo of Selina and Edward is elsewhere attributed to Blondin who the man closely resembles
ReplyDelete